RoboVacDecision
  • TRENDS

360 S6 Pro vs Makita Drc200z 18v X2 Lxt

x
Robovac to replace
Change

S6 Pro

2200 Pa | Wet Mop

360 S6 Pro
Check Price on Amazon
Change

Drc200z 18v X2 Lxt

No Mop

Makita Drc200z 18v X2 Lxt
Check Price on Amazon
360 S6 Pro vs Makita Drc200z 18v X2 Lxt Robovac Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing two different type of robovacs: S6 Pro is a wet mop type whereas Drc200z 18v X2 Lxt is a dry robovac.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of 360 S6 Pro and Makita Drc200z 18v X2 Lxt before getting into our more detailed comparison.

S6 Pro Key Specs

  • 2200 Pa Suction Power
  • Wet Mop type cleaner
  • 240 min. Charging Time
  • 180 min. Run Time
  • 53 dBA Noise Level
  • Height: 10.0 cm
  • Weight: 3.90 kg

Drc200z 18v X2 Lxt Key Specs

  • Dry type cleaner
  • 60 min. Charging Time
  • 200 min. Run Time
  • 64 dBA Noise Level
  • Height: 18.0 cm
  • Weight: 7.80 kg

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how S6 Pro and Drc200z 18v X2 Lxt compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose S6 Pro over Drc200z 18v X2 Lxt
Noise Level 53 dBa vs 64 dBa Lower Noise
Wet Mopping Wet Mop vs Dry Type Better Cleaning Functions
Robovac Height 10.0 cm vs 18.0 cm Better for low height furniture
Robovac Weight 3.90 kg vs 7.80 kg 3.9 kg Lighter
Washable Filter Yes vs None
HEPA Filter Yes vs None
Reasons to choose Drc200z 18v X2 Lxt over S6 Pro
Charging Time 60 min. vs 240 min. Faster Charging
Run Time 200 min. vs 180 min. Longer Run
Dustbin Capacity 2500 ml vs 420 ml Bigger Dustbin
Cleaning Area 500 m² vs 220 m² More cleaning area in one charge
S6 Pro vs Drc200z 18v X2 Lxt Specs Table
Detailed comparison of specifications
General
Brand 360 Makita
Robovac Type Wet Mop Type Dry Type
Released in 2020 0000
Noise Level 53 dBA 64 dBA
Battery Capacity 5200 mAH 8000 mAH
Run Time 180 min 200 min
Charging Time 240 min 60 min
Cleaning Area 220 m² 500 m²
LCD Display
Side Brushes 1 2
Physical Specs
Robot Height 10.0 cm 18.0 cm
Robot Width 35.00 cm 46.00 cm
Weight 3.90 kg 7.80 kg
8.60 lbs 17.20 lbs
Dustbin Capacity 420 ml 2500 ml
Sensors
Dirt Detection
Anti Drop Sensor
Dustbin Full Indicator
Filters & MOP
Washable Filter
HEPA Filter
Advanced Features
Auto Docking and Recharging
Automatic Dirt Disposal
Remote Control
Virtual Walls
Carpet Boost
App Features
Smartphone App
Scheduling
Path Planning
Connectivity
Voice Control
Amazon Alexa Support
Google Assistant Support
Other
Warranty 12 months 12 months

Frequently Asked Questions

The 360 S6 Pro does; the Makita Drc200z 18v X2 Lxt is vacuum-only and doesn't include mopping.

The 360 S6 Pro does; the Makita Drc200z 18v X2 Lxt doesn't use a HEPA filter.

The 360 S6 Pro can; the Makita Drc200z 18v X2 Lxt doesn't have smartphone app support.

The 360 S6 Pro does; the Makita Drc200z 18v X2 Lxt doesn't have automatic carpet boost.

The 360 S6 Pro does; the Makita Drc200z 18v X2 Lxt doesn't support voice assistants.

The 360 S6 Pro, at 53 dBA vs 64 dBA.

The Makita Drc200z 18v X2 Lxt, at 60 min vs 240 min.

The Makita Drc200z 18v X2 Lxt, at 200 min vs 180 min.

The Makita Drc200z 18v X2 Lxt, at 2500 ml vs 420 ml.

The 360 S6 Pro, at 3.9 kg vs 7.8 kg.

The 360 S6 Pro, at 10.0 cm vs 18.0 cm.

The Makita Drc200z 18v X2 Lxt, at 500 m² vs 220 m².

Latest Reviews
xiaomi-robot-vacuum-h50-pro
Xiaomi Robot Vacuum H50 Pro
xiaomi-robot-vacuum-h50
Xiaomi Robot Vacuum H50
roborock-qrevo-edge-2
Roborock Qrevo Edge 2
mova-v70-ultra-complete
Mova V70 Ultra Complete
dreame-l60-ultra-pe
Dreame L60 Ultra Pe
Most Popular
ecovacs-deebot-t90-pro-omni
Ecovacs Deebot T90 Pro Omni
dreame-x60-max-ultra-complete
Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
dreame-aqua10-ultra-roller
Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Roller
dreame-aqua10-roller
Dreame Aqua10 Roller
dreame-l40s-ultra-ce
Dreame L40s Ultra Ce

Copyright © 2026 by RoboVacDecision
About Privacy Trends

Report a Correction