RoboVacDecision
  • TRENDS

Dyson 360 Eye vs Neato Botvac D3 Connected

x
Robovac to replace
Change

360 Eye

No Mop

Dyson 360 Eye
Check Price on Amazon
Change

Botvac D3 Connected

2000 Pa | No Mop

Neato Botvac D3 Connected
Check Price on Amazon
Dyson 360 Eye vs Neato Botvac D3 Connected Robovac Comparison

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Dyson 360 Eye and Neato Botvac D3 Connected before getting into our more detailed comparison.

360 Eye Key Specs

  • Dry type cleaner
  • 150 min. Charging Time
  • 45 min. Run Time
  • 70 dBA Noise Level
  • Height: 12.0 cm
  • Weight: 2.40 kg

Botvac D3 Connected Key Specs

  • 2000 Pa Suction Power
  • Dry type cleaner
  • 180 min. Charging Time
  • 60 min. Run Time
  • 64 dBA Noise Level
  • Height: 9.9 cm
  • Weight: 3.62 kg

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how 360 Eye and Botvac D3 Connected compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose 360 Eye over Botvac D3 Connected
Charging Time 150 min. vs 180 min. Faster Charging
Robovac Weight 2.40 kg vs 3.62 kg 1.22 kg Lighter
Reasons to choose Botvac D3 Connected over 360 Eye
Noise Level 64 dBa vs 70 dBa Lower Noise
Run Time 60 min. vs 45 min. Longer Run
Robovac Height 9.9 cm vs 12.0 cm Better for low height furniture
Dustbin Capacity 700 ml vs 330 ml Bigger Dustbin
360 Eye vs Botvac D3 Connected Specs Table
Detailed comparison of specifications
General
Brand Dyson Neato
Robovac Type Dry Type Dry Type
Released in 0000 2017
Noise Level 70 dBA 64 dBA
Run Time 45 min 60 min
Charging Time 150 min 180 min
LCD Display
Physical Specs
Robot Height 12.0 cm 9.9 cm
Robot Width 24.20 cm 33.50 cm
Weight 2.40 kg 3.62 kg
5.29 lbs 7.98 lbs
Dustbin Capacity 330 ml 700 ml
Sensors
Sensor Type Camera LDS
Dirt Detection
Anti Drop Sensor
Dustbin Full Indicator
Filters & MOP
Washable Filter
HEPA Filter
Advanced Features
High Precision Map
Object Recognition
Recharge Resume
Auto Docking and Recharging
Automatic Dirt Disposal
Rated Power 20 30
Remote Control
Virtual Walls
Manual Movement Control
Carpet Boost
App Features
Smartphone App
Scheduling
Zone Cleaning
Multi Floor Maps
Path Planning
Selected Room Cleaning
Digital Blocked Area
Connectivity
Voice Control
Wireless Frequency 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz
Amazon Alexa Support
Google Assistant Support
Other
Warranty 24 months 12 months

Frequently Asked Questions

The Neato Botvac D3 Connected, at 64 dBA vs 70 dBA.

The Dyson 360 Eye, at 150 min vs 180 min.

The Neato Botvac D3 Connected, at 60 min vs 45 min.

The Neato Botvac D3 Connected, at 700 ml vs 330 ml.

The Dyson 360 Eye, at 2.4 kg vs 3.62 kg.

The Neato Botvac D3 Connected, at 9.9 cm vs 12.0 cm.

No, neither the Dyson 360 Eye nor the Neato Botvac D3 Connected has a mopping function.

No, neither the Dyson 360 Eye nor the Neato Botvac D3 Connected has a self-emptying dock, so the dustbin has to be emptied by hand on both.

No, neither the Dyson 360 Eye nor the Neato Botvac D3 Connected uses a HEPA filter.

No, neither the Dyson 360 Eye nor the Neato Botvac D3 Connected stores more than a single floor map.

Yes, both the Dyson 360 Eye and the Neato Botvac D3 Connected can be controlled and scheduled through a companion app.

No, neither the Dyson 360 Eye nor the Neato Botvac D3 Connected has automatic carpet boost.

Latest Reviews
xiaomi-robot-vacuum-h50-pro
Xiaomi Robot Vacuum H50 Pro
xiaomi-robot-vacuum-h50
Xiaomi Robot Vacuum H50
roborock-qrevo-edge-2
Roborock Qrevo Edge 2
mova-v70-ultra-complete
Mova V70 Ultra Complete
dreame-l60-ultra-pe
Dreame L60 Ultra Pe
Most Popular
ecovacs-deebot-t90-pro-omni
Ecovacs Deebot T90 Pro Omni
dreame-x60-max-ultra-complete
Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
dreame-aqua10-ultra-roller
Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Roller
dreame-aqua10-roller
Dreame Aqua10 Roller
dreame-l40s-ultra-ce
Dreame L40s Ultra Ce

Copyright © 2026 by RoboVacDecision
About Privacy Trends

Report a Correction