RoboVacDecision
  • TRENDS

Eufy Robovac 35c vs Eufy Robovac 11s Max

x
Robovac to replace
Change

Robovac 35c

1500 Pa | No Mop

Eufy Robovac 35c
Check Price on Amazon
Change

Robovac 11s Max

2000 Pa | No Mop

Eufy Robovac 11s Max
Check Price on Amazon
On the market
Eufy Robovac 35c: on the market for 7 years, 11 months
Eufy Robovac 11s Max: on the market for 7 years, 3 months
Eufy Robovac 35c vs Eufy Robovac 11s Max Robovac Comparison

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Eufy Robovac 35c and Eufy Robovac 11s Max before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Robovac 35c Key Specs

  • 1500 Pa Suction Power
  • Dry type cleaner
  • 300 min. Charging Time
  • 100 min. Run Time
  • 55 dBA Noise Level
  • Height: 7.3 cm
  • Weight: 2.60 kg

Robovac 11s Max Key Specs

  • 2000 Pa Suction Power
  • Dry type cleaner
  • 300 min. Charging Time
  • 100 min. Run Time
  • 55 dBA Noise Level
  • Height: 7.2 cm
  • Weight: 2.70 kg

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Robovac 35c and Robovac 11s Max compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose Robovac 35c over Robovac 11s Max
Robovac Weight 2.60 kg vs 2.70 kg 0.1 kg Lighter
Reasons to choose Robovac 11s Max over Robovac 35c
Max Suction Power 2000 Pa vs 1500 Pa Better Suction
Robovac Height 7.2 cm vs 7.3 cm Better for low height furniture
HEPA Filter Yes vs None
Robovac 35c vs Robovac 11s Max Specs Table
Detailed comparison of specifications
General
Brand Eufy Eufy
Robovac Type Dry Type Dry Type
Released in 2018 2019
Suction Power 1500 Pa 2000 Pa
Noise Level 55 dBA 55 dBA
Battery Capacity 2600 mAH 2600 mAH
Run Time 100 min 100 min
Charging Time 300 min 300 min
Cleaning Area 120 m² 120 m²
LCD Display
Side Brushes 2 2
Physical Specs
Robot Height 7.3 cm 7.2 cm
Robot Width 32.50 cm 32.50 cm
Weight 2.60 kg 2.70 kg
5.73 lbs 5.95 lbs
Dustbin Capacity 600 ml 600 ml
Sensors
Dirt Detection
Anti Drop Sensor
Dustbin Full Indicator
Filters & MOP
Washable Filter
HEPA Filter
Advanced Features
Auto Docking and Recharging
Automatic Dirt Disposal
Barrier Cross Height 16 mm 16 mm
Rated Power 25 40
Remote Control
Virtual Walls
Carpet Boost
App Features
Smartphone App
Scheduling
Path Planning
Connectivity
Voice Control
Amazon Alexa Support
Google Assistant Support
Other
Warranty 12 months 12 months

Frequently Asked Questions

The Eufy Robovac 11s Max does; the Eufy Robovac 35c doesn't use a HEPA filter.

The Eufy Robovac 35c can; the Eufy Robovac 11s Max doesn't have smartphone app support.

The Eufy Robovac 35c does; the Eufy Robovac 11s Max doesn't support voice assistants.

The Eufy Robovac 11s Max, at 2000 Pa vs 1500 Pa.

The Eufy Robovac 35c, at 2.6 kg vs 2.7 kg.

The Eufy Robovac 11s Max, at 7.2 cm vs 7.3 cm.

No, neither the Eufy Robovac 35c nor the Eufy Robovac 11s Max has a mopping function.

No, neither the Eufy Robovac 35c nor the Eufy Robovac 11s Max has a self-emptying dock, so the dustbin has to be emptied by hand on both.

Yes, both the Eufy Robovac 35c and the Eufy Robovac 11s Max detect carpet and boost suction automatically.

Yes, both the Eufy Robovac 35c and the Eufy Robovac 11s Max return to their dock on their own to recharge.

Both run at the same noise level: 55 dBA.

Both take the same time to charge: 300 min.

Latest Reviews
xiaomi-robot-vacuum-h50-pro
Xiaomi Robot Vacuum H50 Pro
xiaomi-robot-vacuum-h50
Xiaomi Robot Vacuum H50
roborock-qrevo-edge-2
Roborock Qrevo Edge 2
mova-v70-ultra-complete
Mova V70 Ultra Complete
dreame-l60-ultra-pe
Dreame L60 Ultra Pe
Most Popular
ecovacs-deebot-t90-pro-omni
Ecovacs Deebot T90 Pro Omni
dreame-x60-max-ultra-complete
Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
dreame-aqua10-ultra-roller
Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Roller
dreame-aqua10-roller
Dreame Aqua10 Roller
dreame-l40s-ultra-ce
Dreame L40s Ultra Ce

Copyright © 2026 by RoboVacDecision
About Privacy Trends

Report a Correction