RoboVacDecision
  • TRENDS

Irobot Roomba 614 vs Neato Botvac D3 Connected

x
Robovac to replace
Change

Roomba 614

600 Pa | No Mop

Irobot Roomba 614
Check Price on Amazon
Change

Botvac D3 Connected

2000 Pa | No Mop

Neato Botvac D3 Connected
Check Price on Amazon
On the market
Irobot Roomba 614: on the market for 14 years, 3 months
Neato Botvac D3 Connected: on the market for 8 years, 9 months
Irobot Roomba 614 vs Neato Botvac D3 Connected Robovac Comparison

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Irobot Roomba 614 and Neato Botvac D3 Connected before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Roomba 614 Key Specs

  • 600 Pa Suction Power
  • Dry type cleaner
  • 120 min. Charging Time
  • 90 min. Run Time
  • Height: 9.3 cm
  • Weight: 3.40 kg

Botvac D3 Connected Key Specs

  • 2000 Pa Suction Power
  • Dry type cleaner
  • 180 min. Charging Time
  • 60 min. Run Time
  • 64 dBA Noise Level
  • Height: 9.9 cm
  • Weight: 3.62 kg

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Roomba 614 and Botvac D3 Connected compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose Roomba 614 over Botvac D3 Connected
Charging Time 120 min. vs 180 min. Faster Charging
Run Time 90 min. vs 60 min. Longer Run
Robovac Height 9.3 cm vs 9.9 cm Better for low height furniture
Robovac Weight 3.40 kg vs 3.62 kg 0.22 kg Lighter
Reasons to choose Botvac D3 Connected over Roomba 614
Max Suction Power 2000 Pa vs 600 Pa Better Suction
Roomba 614 vs Botvac D3 Connected Specs Table
Detailed comparison of specifications
General
Brand Irobot Neato
Robovac Type Dry Type Dry Type
Released in 2012 2017
Suction Power 600 Pa 2000 Pa
Battery Capacity 1800 mAH 2100 mAH
Run Time 90 min 60 min
Charging Time 120 min 180 min
LCD Display
Side Brushes 1 1
Physical Specs
Robot Height 9.3 cm 9.9 cm
Robot Width 34.00 cm 33.50 cm
Weight 3.40 kg 3.62 kg
7.50 lbs 7.98 lbs
Sensors
Dirt Detection
Anti Drop Sensor
Dustbin Full Indicator
Filters & MOP
Washable Filter
HEPA Filter
Advanced Features
Auto Docking and Recharging
Automatic Dirt Disposal
Rated Power 33 30
Remote Control
Virtual Walls
Carpet Boost
App Features
Smartphone App
Scheduling
Path Planning
Connectivity
Voice Control
Amazon Alexa Support
Google Assistant Support
Other
Warranty 12 months 12 months

Frequently Asked Questions

The Neato Botvac D3 Connected can; the Irobot Roomba 614 doesn't have smartphone app support.

The Neato Botvac D3 Connected does; the Irobot Roomba 614 doesn't support voice assistants.

The Neato Botvac D3 Connected, at 2000 Pa vs 600 Pa.

The Irobot Roomba 614, at 120 min vs 180 min.

The Irobot Roomba 614, at 90 min vs 60 min.

The Irobot Roomba 614, at 3.4 kg vs 3.62 kg.

The Irobot Roomba 614, at 9.3 cm vs 9.9 cm.

No, neither the Irobot Roomba 614 nor the Neato Botvac D3 Connected has a mopping function.

No, neither the Irobot Roomba 614 nor the Neato Botvac D3 Connected has a self-emptying dock, so the dustbin has to be emptied by hand on both.

No, neither the Irobot Roomba 614 nor the Neato Botvac D3 Connected uses a HEPA filter.

No, neither the Irobot Roomba 614 nor the Neato Botvac D3 Connected has automatic carpet boost.

Yes, both the Irobot Roomba 614 and the Neato Botvac D3 Connected return to their dock on their own to recharge.

Latest Reviews
xiaomi-robot-vacuum-h50-pro
Xiaomi Robot Vacuum H50 Pro
xiaomi-robot-vacuum-h50
Xiaomi Robot Vacuum H50
roborock-qrevo-edge-2
Roborock Qrevo Edge 2
mova-v70-ultra-complete
Mova V70 Ultra Complete
dreame-l60-ultra-pe
Dreame L60 Ultra Pe
Most Popular
ecovacs-deebot-t90-pro-omni
Ecovacs Deebot T90 Pro Omni
dreame-x60-max-ultra-complete
Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
dreame-aqua10-ultra-roller
Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Roller
dreame-aqua10-roller
Dreame Aqua10 Roller
dreame-l40s-ultra-ce
Dreame L40s Ultra Ce

Copyright © 2026 by RoboVacDecision
About Privacy Trends

Report a Correction