RoboVacDecision
  • TRENDS
  • NOISE
  • PET HAIR

Miele Scout Rx2 vs Iclebo Arte

x
Robovac to replace
Change

Scout Rx2

No Mop

Miele Scout Rx2
Check Price on Amazon
Change

Arte

Wet Mop

Iclebo Arte
Check Price on Amazon
Miele Scout Rx2 vs Iclebo Arte Robovac Comparison

In this review, we will be comparing two different type of robovacs: Scout Rx2 is a dry type whereas Arte is a wet mop robovac.

Let's have a brief look at the main features of Miele Scout Rx2 and Iclebo Arte before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Scout Rx2 Key Specs

  • Dry type cleaner
  • 120 min. Charging Time
  • 120 min. Run Time
  • 60 dBA Noise Level
  • Height: 8.5 cm
  • Weight: 5.40 kg

Arte Key Specs

  • Wet Mop type cleaner
  • 110 min. Charging Time
  • 120 min. Run Time
  • 58 dBA Noise Level
  • Height: 8.9 cm
  • Weight: 2.80 kg

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Scout Rx2 and Arte compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose Scout Rx2 over Arte
Robovac Height 8.5 cm vs 8.9 cm Better for low height furniture
Cleaning Area 760 m² vs 150 m² More cleaning area in one charge
Reasons to choose Arte over Scout Rx2
Noise Level 58 dBa vs 60 dBa Lower Noise
Wet Mopping Wet Mop vs Dry Type Better Cleaning Functions
Charging Time 110 min. vs 120 min. Faster Charging
Robovac Weight 2.80 kg vs 5.40 kg 2.6 kg Lighter
Scout Rx2 vs Arte Specs Table
Detailed comparison of specifications
General
Brand Miele Iclebo
Robovac Type Dry Type Wet Mop Type
Released in 0000 0000
Noise Level (how loud is that?) 60 dBA 58 dBA
Battery Capacity 4400 mAH 4400 mAH
Run Time 120 min 120 min
Charging Time 120 min 110 min
Cleaning Area 760 m² 150 m²
LCD Display
Side Brushes 2 2
Physical Specs
Robot Height 8.5 cm 8.9 cm
Robot Width 35.30 cm 34.00 cm
Weight 5.40 kg 2.80 kg
11.90 lbs 6.17 lbs
Sensors
Sensor Type Camera, Gyroscope Camera
Dirt Detection
Anti Drop Sensor
Dustbin Full Indicator
Filters & MOP
Washable Filter
HEPA Filter
Advanced Features
Object Recognition
Recharge Resume
Auto Docking and Recharging
Automatic Dirt Disposal
Barrier Cross Height 19 mm 18 mm
Rated Power 30 12
Remote Control
Virtual Walls
Carpet Boost
App Features
Smartphone App
Scheduling
Path Planning
Connectivity
Voice Control
Wireless Frequency 2.4 GHz N/A
Amazon Alexa Support
Google Assistant Support
Other
Warranty 24 months 12 months

Frequently Asked Questions

The Iclebo Arte does; the Miele Scout Rx2 is vacuum-only and doesn't include mopping.

The Miele Scout Rx2 can; the Iclebo Arte doesn't have smartphone app support.

The Miele Scout Rx2 does; the Iclebo Arte doesn't have automatic carpet boost.

The Iclebo Arte, at 58 dBA vs 60 dBA.

The Iclebo Arte, at 110 min vs 120 min.

The Iclebo Arte, at 2.8 kg vs 5.4 kg.

The Miele Scout Rx2, at 8.5 cm vs 8.9 cm.

The Miele Scout Rx2, at 760 m² vs 150 m².

No, neither the Miele Scout Rx2 nor the Iclebo Arte has a self-emptying dock, so the dustbin has to be emptied by hand on both.

Yes, both the Miele Scout Rx2 and the Iclebo Arte use a HEPA filter.

Yes, both the Miele Scout Rx2 and the Iclebo Arte return to their dock on their own to recharge.

No, neither the Miele Scout Rx2 nor the Iclebo Arte supports Amazon Alexa or Google Assistant.

Latest Reviews
roborock-qrevo-edge-3-pro
Roborock Qrevo Edge 3 Pro
xiaomi-robot-vacuum-h50-pro
Xiaomi Robot Vacuum H50 Pro
xiaomi-robot-vacuum-h50
Xiaomi Robot Vacuum H50
roborock-qrevo-edge-2
Roborock Qrevo Edge 2
mova-v70-ultra-complete
Mova V70 Ultra Complete
Most Popular
eufy-robovac-11s
Eufy Robovac 11s
eufy-robovac-30c
Eufy Robovac 30c
dreame-x50-ultra
Dreame X50 Ultra
ecovacs-deebot-t90-pro-omni
Ecovacs Deebot T90 Pro Omni
shark-powerdetect-nevertouch-pro-2-in-1-rv2820ze
Shark Powerdetect Nevertouch Pro 2 In 1 Rv2820ze

Copyright © 2026 by RoboVacDecision
About Privacy Trends Noise Levels Pet Hair

Report a Correction